![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg1C-vynyXb3Dv3FnuPc5Q7jDFmoNyB3Kpe2ht-sNloGClWSz8QJrP2VFM3bz6-zkpfi0e7b7z2hayjJoBqpDKCsqMGYaJa8C6kQT1cVedt_JqX8Ierj19amStEQ0UhdI-4Qe7_/s400/Benjamin+Robbins+Curtis.jpg)
Yesterday, I pointed out Paul Finkelman's article on Dred Scott: Was Dred Scott Correctly Decided? An "Expert Report" for the Defendant. Having now read it, I'm pleased to report that it's excellent. In 34 pages you get a crisp summary of the often obscure facts, a comprehensible description of the tangled procedural background, and a fine and well-ordered outline and discussion of the issues. The nice thing is that it's accessible, I believe, to non-lawyers trying to understand what was going on. If you take the time to read the article with a little care, you'll be well rewarded. Highly recommended.
No comments:
Post a Comment